filemaker pro server can you also use open remote

Moreover, since AppStream applications are delivered through a web browser, users don’t actually have to install FileMaker Pro on their local machines. Because AppStream instances live in AWS, you can configure a fleet to run in the same AWS region as your FileMaker server, effectively putting them in the same local network and giving you the speed of a LAN connection. Amazon’s AppStream 2.0 is an application streaming service that allows you to stream desktop applications from AWS to a user through a web browser. There are ways to optimize FileMaker for WAN performance, but if your database is sufficiently complicated, performance over the WAN simply might not be workable.

Chief among these is performance: If you’re connecting from your office to a FileMaker database hosted in AWS, you’re doing so over the WAN. Even with all these benefits, running FileMaker Server in AWS does have its drawbacks. The fact that you can provision a FileMaker Cloud server and not have to worry about hardware failure or replacement, disaster recovery, or managing the server OS, makes the prospect of running a local server machine much less attractive (though there might still be valid reasons to do so). Reliability, availability, redundancy, scalability, security, and cost optimization are all reasons to consider employing cloud services for your computing infrastructure needs. The benefits of cloud computing are many.

And in late 2016, FileMaker unveiled FileMaker Cloud, a new AWS-based service that allows you to deploy a FileMaker server without having to spend the time and resources normally required to build out and manage a server machine. FileMaker Server can be run in the cloud through a cloud services provider such as Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Microsoft Azure. Over the past several years, FileMaker has entered the cloud computing landscape.

Filemaker pro server can you also use open remote